Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gerben Wierda's avatar

It's not just the number if qbits, the error correction, or the stability.

Google improved on its Sycamore hardware and did better on the 'hardware test'. The biggest problem of QM computing is the one conveniently seldom mentioned: software. All we have is simulation of physics and the like (which is great) and a tiny handful of algorithms (not for want of trying for more than 30 years) to speed up digital problems. Isn't it interesting that when talking such algorithms/uses, only one is always mentioned (Shor's).

See https://ea.rna.nl/2019/03/13/to-be-and-not-to-be-is-that-the-answer/ (I was told by someone at a QM computing institution: correct...) and its follow-up about Sycamore.

Expand full comment

No posts